"I will arrange a press conference with the GEMA and representatives of the media, in order to to arouse public interest. but only if 100 other people will sign this pledge."
— bruder, Musician, Author, Composer, Neoist, etc. (contact)
Deadline to sign up by: la 31-a de Aŭgusto 2009
112 people signed up (12 over target)
Country: Germany
More details
The GEMA-problem must be put in the public eye.
It is therefore it is important to raise public interest in the subject.
Members of the GEMA (Authors, Composers, Publishers) must have the right to choose which license they want to apply to their work (after all it's "THEIR'S" :) ).
See more pledges, and all about how PledgeBank works.

bruder, the Pledge Creator, joined by:
Some of the people who signed this pledge also signed these pledges...
just sign it if you wanna help.
greetz
There are some venues who only play CC-music so they don't need ot pay the GEMA. If If CC-Licensed works could be GEMA-'protected', they would probably drop that policy because they'd have to pay GEMA again unless they do an exhaustive research on the tracks they're playing.
Young people like to share music via P2P or directly on their blogs and homepages. Thanks to CC they can do this legally. If CC-Licensed works could be GEMA-'protected', they'd be in danger of prosecution once again.
Some bookers only book bands who offer CC-material to save GEMA costs.
The list goes on and on...
Many of the vantages artist currently have if they license their work CC would be void if CC-Licensed works could be GEMA-'protected'.
i don't think you understand cc-licenses nor the pledge at all.
the aim is to strengthen cc and not gema-protect anything that's licensed under cc...
greetz
raziel
What I don't want is that an artist who releases a work under CC can Gema-protect that work.